Subject: re: Refactoring MI devices in GENERIC and friends
To: Michael Lorenz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: matthew green <email@example.com>
Date: 09/10/2007 07:34:02
> None of the problems that I saw would be caught by a compile--only by
> trying to use the hardware. I don't have a real problem with including
> devices in a compile, but making the leap to "supported" or "expected
> to run" would be unconscionable.
True. So we should probably have an ALL that contains everything and
leave in GENERIC what's known working?
perhaps we can put "no foo at bar" in GENERIC for devices not
yet known to work, and leave ALL with everything?