Subject: Re: soc zfs: taskqueue / workqueue
To: Juan RP <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Oliver Gould <email@example.com>
Date: 07/09/2007 22:27:24
On 2007-07-10 00:37 -0500, Juan RP wrote:
> But Matt Thomas told me some time ago that it's better to use
> workqueue(9) because using a dedicated kthread consumes more
Doesn't workqueue_create() makes its own kthread (by way of
workqueue_initqueue()). How is this more lightweight?
Though, I'll probably end up going with tron@'s (off-list) suggestion
and letting the LKM load hang indefinitely.