Haai,

On Fri, June 22, 2007 12:14, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:32:45PM -0600, George Peter Staplin wrote:
>> I think it's clear that LFS will never be stable with the current
>> people working on it.  LFS needs to be restructured, like many parts
>> of NetBSD.  It contains a lot of unfactored, densely-nested code.
>
> Can you please avoid making such highly insulting comments? They offer
> *no* value at all but to annoy people.

Alright, I'll bite once more.

This is the /entire/ problem with NetBSD. The project is run by
``highly-valued people'' (I'm paraphrasing severely here, but given your
attitude it's too obvious to pass by), while it is never clear what
``highly-valued'' actually means and from who this designation originates.
Personally (yes, /personally/) I suspect a routine (seen worse) case of
oligarchism. It is clearly forgotten that everyone needs a good kick in
the ass from time to time, including ``highly-valued people''. You curse
that fact as an annoyance instead of using it to sharpen your skills and
improve your work. Taking this kind of messages as ``highly insulting''
demonstrates a clear lack of self-insight.

Needless to say, if I'd been working on LFS, I would take this and other
messages from the past about the topic as warning sings of a possible mind
lock. Instead, you instigate topic drift in a transparent attempt to
diffuse the real issues.

Baai,

De Zeurkous
-----------

Friggin' Machines!

>
> Joerg
>