Subject: Re: FYI: ENVSYS 2 ready
To: Valeriy E. Ushakov <uwe@stderr.spb.ru>
From: Juan RP <juan@xtrarom.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/21/2007 11:57:33
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:55:54 +0400
"Valeriy E. Ushakov" <uwe@stderr.spb.ru> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:08:19 +0200, Juan RP wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:02:44 +0900
> > "Masao Uebayashi" <uebayasi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I don't like struct tables are put in headers.
> > 
> > What do you suggest then? I need those available for at least three
> > components: sysmon_envsys.c, sysmon_envsys_events.c and envstat.c.
> 
> Yes, tables in headers is totally wrong.  Also, think about l10n on
> messages for envstat(8), for which such static tables are not enough.

I'm fixing it... I'm just testing the changes now.

-- 
Juan Romero Pardines	- The NetBSD Project
http://plog.xtrarom.org	- NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish