On May 31, 2007, at 10:07 AM, matthew green wrote:

>
>
>   On May 31, 2007, at 3:49 AM, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
>
>> Now, I wonder if all the churn can be justified for an unused
>> (in-tree) library that existed in -current for less then a month.
>> (SA syscalls removal was way more distruptive :))))
>
>   Yah, I think we can let this one slide.
>
> we should still bump the userland librt major version.

I don't see why -- it won't being any benefit unless you actually  
version the system call.

-- thorpej