On May 3, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Oliver Gould wrote:
>Is it safe to assume that thorpej-atomic has been merged with -current
>recently enough for newlock2 to be present?

I definitely asked this question backwards (s/merg/branch/).

dillo answered my real question:

On 2007-05-03 20:29 -0500, Dieter Baron wrote:
>   thorpej-atomic has not been merged yet, but was branched after
> newlock2 was merged.  So the thorpej-atomic branch has newlock2.

Is there any reason not to use thorpej-atomic for development?

  - Oliver