On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:34:56 +0100
David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk> wrote:

> Is it worth using uint8_t for any of the fields - given the implicit
> padding in the above structure.

What type do you suggest then?

> Similarly I'd use a multiple of 4 for desc[].

desc[33] is what it's using currently... I agree, I'll make it 32 then.

-- 
http://plog.xtrarom.org/
Juan RP's blog - NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish