Subject: Re: poolifying fileassoc
To: None <email@example.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/08/2007 01:07:23
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:29:22AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > it takes too much arguments. it should be more self-contained, IMO.
> > eg. it's better to make uvm_io_done acquire locks by itself.
> OK - I have redone uvm_io_done(), it takes far fewer arguments, works
> out some things from the iobuf and acquires the locks itself. I have
> tried this code with a multiprocessor DIAGNOSTIC kernel, it appears to
> work fine.
> Brett Lymn
can you rebase it to -current?