yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > > do you still need the lwp argument for sched_nextlwp()?
> > Thought curlwp could be used instead. Remove it?
> 
> whichever curlwp or an explicit argument, does your sched_nextlwp use it
> for something?
Yes, it needs "old" LWP, which is equal to curlwp at that stage. So I suggest
to remove the argument and use curlwp inside (when needed, of course).

-- 
Best regards,
Mindaugas
www.NetBSD.org