Subject: delay(9)
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: John Nemeth <jnemeth@victoria.tc.ca>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/24/2007 04:05:18 
     The manpage for delay(9)/DELAY(9) states that DELAY(9) is safe for
use in interrupt context.  To me, this implies that delay(9) might not
be safe for use in interrupt context (otherwise why mention it?).  So,
is it okay to use delay(9) in interrupt context?  Either way, the
manpage should be adjusted to clarify this.