Subject: Re: Further works on yamt-idlelwp
To: None <rmind@NetBSD.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/22/2007 12:16:30
> 2. As already discussed, currently, there is a problem with p_estcpu and
> p_pctcpu, which should be scheduler-independent. As mentioned, there is also
> a ccpu value, which is SCHED_4BSD specific. These are used in ps(1), top(1),
> etc. It would be good to find a solution what and how to deal with these. All
> suggestions are welcome.
isn't ccpu scheduler-indepenent as p_pctcpu?
YAMAMOTO Takashi