Subject: Re: SoC project proposal
To: haad <haaaad@gmail.com>
From: Bill Stouder-Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/18/2007 16:08:46
--oOB74oR0WcNeq9Zb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 01:10:21PM +0100, haad wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:19:39AM +0100, haad wrote:
> >> User land part
> >>
> >> I have to write usable BSD license mke2fs program, and e2fsck if we wa=
nt to use
> >> ext3 file system without additional packages from pkgsrc. Here I will =
also write
> >> new or extend our mount_e2fs to support journaling.
> >=20
> > This is not correct. While we would PREFER a BSD-licensed set of tools,=
we=20
> > can use GPL'd tools if needed. I mainly mention this as the other aspec=
ts=20
> > of this project NEED to happen in the SoC time frame, while this can be=
=20
> > cleaned up later.
>=20
> Sorry for this, I will remove this part from my project proposal.
Just making it an optinal, "if time permits," thing will be fine.
You will be required to deliver what you promise to get the money, or we
have to somehow explain why you get full funding even w/o having all the
deliverables. Thus it is unfair to make (or even let) you list required
deliverables that are beyond what is necessary. But "nice to have" is fine=
=20
if listed as such.
Take care,
Bill
--oOB74oR0WcNeq9Zb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFF/dSOWz+3JHUci9cRAkyEAKCFbV5yVzgNqt3SNHl3MsYPNFA1MgCfRHAm
KpP9AnFNfuh6bdwi83dqiDc=
=JJLf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--oOB74oR0WcNeq9Zb--