Subject: Re: DPRINTF in ?
To: David Young <dyoung@pobox.com>
From: Iain Hibbert <plunky@rya-online.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/16/2007 22:14:00
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, David Young wrote:

> Two thoughts:
>
>         C99 variadic macros make it easier to read & write debug
>         statements than the DPRINTF(level, (fmt, arg1, ...)) idiom.

Thats exactly one of the things I would like to be rid of..

>         a debug bitmask is at least as expressive as a debug level,
>         and more versatile.

Ok, and somebody else mentioned this as well - I'll think about how that
could work, as it is not as easy for users to understand (from the sysctl
direction)

iain