Subject: Re: RFRAC: p4tcc
To: Martin Husemann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Juan RP <email@example.com>
Date: 03/14/2007 23:53:58
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Juan RP wrote:
> > IMHO it's better to have this until sysmon_cpu gets finished
> Yes, sure, I have no problem with that as a temporary hack.
> But how do this features operate independently? Are there cpus that both
> have TM and EST or is that impossible? If not, we could abstract the name
> and just use the same node everywhere. If both could coexist, how would
> that work? I have one cpu with TM and no EST, and another with TM2 and EST
> - so I am confused.
BTW this driver is only for the feature TM (Thermal Monitor) not TM2 (this one
is capable to change FIDs and VIDs).
Juan RP's blog - NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish