yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> do you mean that there can be schedulers which don't enqueue the lwp
> in sched_switch?  if so, can you give me an example?
No.
Essential point is that I don't think it is a good to _split_ enqueueing
action by the _purpose_, because it is better to have the _rule_ in this case.

I am not sure if I understand your point... Do you think it's wrong?

-- 
Best regards,
Mindaugas
www.NetBSD.org