On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:50:59PM -0700, Bucky Katz wrote:
> Was this a wholesale replacement of caddr_t by 'void *'?  Because
> doing that would do as much harm as good, since caddr_t does have a
> legitimate use that void * can't fill.

Of course not.  It was done with some care, but there were still
a number of oversights or goofs--catching up on source-changes and
seeing a number of fixups by a number of people led me to ask about
the original reason for the change since it seems to be taking (or
"have taken" at this point?) a non-trivial amount of time & effort
to clean up.

-allen

-- 
Allen Briggs  |  http://www.ninthwonder.com/~briggs/  |  briggs@ninthwonder.com