yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> it sounds like a word game to me.
Sorry, I am probably bad on explaining :)

> whatever you call it, "enqueue for yielding" or "enqueue as a part of
> sched_switch", you made dispatcher know the purpose of enqueue, didn't you?
No. Dispatcher has the rule to not enqueue (by giving this job to
sched_switch() ), but knows nothing about purposes.

-- 
Best regards,
Mindaugas
www.NetBSD.org