[ubt]
plunky@rya-online.net said:
> This means then, that as-is**, it should really match against device
> class (as attached)? 

I'd say so. While the USB class code table says that the Bluetooth
cladd _may_ refer to devices rather than interfaces, the bluetooth
spec is quite clear that the device header is supposed to contain
the class information.

I'll test your patch later today.

best regards
Matthias