Subject: Re: Belkin Bluetooth vs aue vs ubt
To: Stephen Borrill <netbsd@precedence.co.uk>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/08/2007 08:15:27
--N/GrjenRD+RJfyz+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:10:45PM +0000, Stephen Borrill wrote:
> aue uses:
> #define UMATCH_VENDOR_PRODUCT				13
>=20
> ubt uses:
> #define UMATCH_IFACECLASS_IFACESUBCLASS_IFACEPROTO	5
>=20
> So aue will always win.

right. I think what jason was trying to say was that instead of adding
"quirks" to aue, add a quirk to ubt for this specific vendor/product
to match at >13, but only if it's also in the bluetooth class.  ie, be
more affirmative in claiming the device where it belongs, rather than
ignoring it somewhere it doesn't.

--
Dan.

--N/GrjenRD+RJfyz+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFF7ytvEAVxvV4N66cRAu0LAKDUTOxsBMe/PUhFM2TZLBiTsNwVjgCgz8l/
OhRmyWr7nlYbV2SOSd0d/8Q=
=1+16
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--N/GrjenRD+RJfyz+--