On Mar 7, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Stephen Borrill wrote:

> I've had a quick look at that and we don't define any other subclass  
> or proto for UDCLASS_WIRELESS (though I guess they must be defined  
> somewhere). As its 'other' match is Wireless Ethernet, the class is  
> the same. This could do with testing on real hardware.

Well, aue shouldn't be WIRELESS :-)  It's Ethernet.

-- thorpej