Subject: Re: sched_changepri, and priority levels
To: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/06/2007 17:16:27
On Mar 6, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
> which is why I wanted kernel realtime. Note that the recently
> committed OSK5912 support in evbarm supports 160 interrupt sources,
> so having lots of interrupt priorities gives a lot of flexibility on
> those interrupts.
So, basically every kernel thread that we have now would map into
"kernel real-time"?
-- thorpej