--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:25:06PM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> So it works about as well as a single real disk that big would
> (assuming a disk interface that didn't have a 2T limit)?  That's about
> as much as I could expect.

Yeah. I did it this way because the SAN's own setup couldn't make a
LUN bigger than 2T, so I made several at that size and RF'd them.

> > I didn't use it extensively enough to detect the kinds of subtle
> > filesystem problems you've seen in the past, but if you're using the
> > volume for something else than FFS that shouldn't be as much of a
> > concern.
>=20
> No, it'd be used for FFS, and I'd throw my filesystem tester stuff at
> it before committing real data to it.  I just wanted to save the time
> and effort if it were known to be busted or something.

Ahuh.  Good luck, I'd be very glad of thorough validation of FFS >2T too.

--
Dan.
--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFF7IBfEAVxvV4N66cRAsndAJ0aP/BYihZ8NSSonX68ZtnN3usd6QCePH5U
Hqu8SMlKeu2r5pw93XsWIIc=
=xL04
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM--