--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:31:46PM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> Is RAIDframe terabyte-clean?  In particular, if I RAIDframe together
> partitions so as to produce a RAID volume larger than 2TB, will the
> resulting volume work?  (Okay, let's say not, does it work, but raer,
> should it work.  Unless someone has experience saying it does, which
> would be very welcome.)
>=20
> This is under 3.0.=20

I had a ~10Tb RF on my laptop a few years back while setting up a new
SAN, and posted some details.  I can't recall what version was
-current at the time, but it was very very likely before 3.0; check
the archives. =20

It seemed to work fine for the raw partition (I couldn't use
disklabel, as you would be aware).  I didn't use it extensively enough
to detect the kinds of subtle filesystem problems you've seen in the
past, but if you're using the volume for something else than FFS that
shouldn't be as much of a concern.

--
Dan.

--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFF7HpPEAVxvV4N66cRAm5oAKCVylFbpugAz7ge1CrkgDTaSrbTewCg4pIM
NF5ST8iviK3OlsvqDtzPeyY=
=Kevq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--