Subject: Re: Further works on yamt-idlelwp
To: Daniel Sieger <dsieger@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/05/2007 10:19:56
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:06:30PM +0100, Daniel Sieger wrote:
>
> Fine thing, we'll definetly need those. I'm not sure if I really like
> the naming, though. I'd suggest something like the following:
>
> cpu_sd_data for struct cpu_data
> p_sd_data for struct proc
> l_sd_data for struct lwp
>
> The "sd" in the above obviously denotes "scheduler dependent".
We already have an "sd" in our kernel, "scsi disk". A different
acronym might be a better idea...
Thor