Subject: Re: Interrupt, interrupt threads, continuations, and kernel lwps
To: None <>
From: Bucky Katz <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/22/2007 17:30:02 writes:

> That's an unfortunate choice of terminology. it'S inviting confusion
> to say that a new approach does just what we did before, when it
> doesn't, and the details matter.

Is there, by any chance, a write up that describes the current

A lot of the terminology here has been confusing me, but I thought
that was just because I've only recently come to this discussion. Now
I'm not so sure.