Subject: Re: Scheduler API changes for yamt-idlelwp
To: None <dsieger@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/21/2007 20:06:25
> To sum this up: I don't think leaving schedcpu() as it is will lead to
> too much code duplication. Not all schedulers will need schedcpu() in
> its current incarnation. And it is IMHO the most clean solution for
> the moment.
> What do you think?
"for the moment" means you have some ideas for long term?