Subject: Re: Please Revert newlock2
To: der Mouse <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Zafer Aydogan <email@example.com>
Date: 02/21/2007 09:57:05
I'm agreeing with Mouse.
It should be possible to leave "M:N" as an compile option, for those,
like Bucky, who work with it.
2007/2/21, der Mouse <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > I don't (speak for core). However, the momentum (in both reasoning
> > and deeds) is too strong to go back at this point.
> I've been hearing people saying for a long time that NetBSD needs new
> users. Here we have a user, a user squarely in the middle of what we
> have been claiming NetBSD is all about, pointing out that we've broken
> something he was depending on - because it was an advertised feature, I
> gather - without any replacement, and you're saying, damn the
> torpedoes, full speed ahead away from being useful to this user.
> Something's wrong with this picture.
> There is no reason whatever we couldn't go back. CVS is totally
> competent to cough up the state the tree used to be in. A more
> accurate phrasing would be that you are not willing to go back.
> /~\ The ASCII der Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
> X Against HTML email@example.com
> / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B