I'm agreeing with Mouse.

It should be possible to leave  "M:N" as an compile option, for those,
like Bucky, who work with it.

Zafer.



2007/2/21, der Mouse <mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca>:
> > I don't (speak for core).  However, the momentum (in both reasoning
> > and deeds) is too strong to go back at this point.
>
> ...huh?
>
> I've been hearing people saying for a long time that NetBSD needs new
> users.  Here we have a user, a user squarely in the middle of what we
> have been claiming NetBSD is all about, pointing out that we've broken
> something he was depending on - because it was an advertised feature, I
> gather - without any replacement, and you're saying, damn the
> torpedoes, full speed ahead away from being useful to this user.
>
> Something's wrong with this picture.
>
> There is no reason whatever we couldn't go back.  CVS is totally
> competent to cough up the state the tree used to be in.  A more
> accurate phrasing would be that you are not willing to go back.
>
> /~\ The ASCII                           der Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
>  X  Against HTML               mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
> / \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>