Subject: Re: Please Revert newlock2
To: Bucky Katz <bucky@picovex.com>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/21/2007 13:11:11
--6ys2uLYBf50XP5fk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:37:30PM -0800, Bucky Katz wrote:
> We (well, at least I,) have moved past the revert request=20
Then at least *please* adjust the Subject: line... :-)
--
Dan.
--6ys2uLYBf50XP5fk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFF26o/EAVxvV4N66cRAvOFAKDIU+7Z9yfwP5QJWXmortZ6vmPWqgCgvwKE
WhED5Kz4tITdI2TbE6FAHe4=
=TE0j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6ys2uLYBf50XP5fk--