Subject: Re: Please Revert newlock2
To: Bucky Katz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Simon Burge <simonb@NetBSD.org>
Date: 02/21/2007 12:40:37
Bucky Katz wrote:
> Andrew Doran <email@example.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:45:28PM -0800, Bucky Katz wrote:
> >> I dunno. #ifdefing out the "new scheduling infrastructure" should be
> >> just as easy as #ifdefing in the SA code.
> >> Not seeing a problem here.
> > Sorry, but 1:1 threading is not going away. As others have pointed
> > out, if you need stability then you automatically need to use a
> > release branch of NetBSD. That is our stated position, and it's
> > plain as day:
> I don't recall anybody asking for 1:1 to 'go away'. I merely asked for
> you to honor a goal you'd previously stated.
Did you read all of Andy's message from about half an hour ago where he
explained why he changed this goal? Goals are allowed to change...