On Feb 20, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Bucky Katz wrote:

> I also wasn't aware that you spoke for core.  Where I last left this
> with core was an investigation to see how reasonable it would be to
> do, that's been hampered by tip'o'tree at first not building and now
> not running on ARM.

I don't (speak for core).  However, the momentum (in both reasoning  
and deeds) is too strong to go back at this point.

-- thorpej