Subject: Re: Please Revert newlock2
To: None <>
From: Bucky Katz <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/20/2007 14:45:28
Jason Thorpe <> writes:

> On Feb 18, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>> 2) Either cause them to perform acceptably for your application, or
>> else
>>    endeavor to get M:N back in a supported state for uniprocessors.
> The issue is adapting the SA code to all of the new scheduling
> infrastructure that came along with newlock2.  It's not a simple
> matter.

I dunno. #ifdefing out the "new scheduling infrastructure" should be
just as easy as #ifdefing in the SA code.

Not seeing a problem here.