Subject: Re: Renaming l_priority and l_usrpri
To: Pavel Cahyna <email@example.com>
From: Mindaugas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/19/2007 01:58:36
Pavel Cahyna <email@example.com> wrote:
> The field names in struct kinfo_lwp should not change. This structure is
> AIUI supposed to stay compatible.
Yes, but I am not sure if we will avoid this. It is likely that we will need
to change it with scheduler abstraction changes and/or "LWPization" (p_pctcpu,
p_estcpu existence) - see Daniel's mail about scheduler API.
In any case, this definitly needs a consideration.