Subject: Re: Please Revert newlock2
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Bucky Katz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/18/2007 18:08:32
"Thomas E. Spanjaard" <email@example.com> writes:
> Bucky Katz wrote:
>> Thor Lancelot Simon <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>>2) Either cause them to perform acceptably for your application, or else
>>> endeavor to get M:N back in a supported state for uniprocessors.
>> It has to be the later. The context switch overhead of 1:1 on ARM will
>> cause a severe performance degradation.
> Doesn't OMAP support the v4/v5 hyped fast address space switching?
I dunno. I don't recognize it by that name and can't find any term
like that in the processor TRM.
If you mean (and I suspect you do) The "Fast Context Switch Extention"
FCSE, then yes the OMAP processors we are currently using support it.
for a description of FCSE (on page 3) the upshot of which is that
implementing FCSE in NetBSD would require a bunch of work outside of
the OMAP port to support the architectural restrictions.