Subject: Re: safety of UFS_DIRHASH
To: Blair Sadewitz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Zafer Aydogan <email@example.com>
Date: 02/17/2007 00:01:55
I'm solely using LFS since a year on all of my systems and I have the
feeling that LFS is by default faster than FFS.
I will now try UFS_DIRHASH on LFS, to see the additional performance win.
2007/2/16, Blair Sadewitz <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> I enabled UFS_DIRHASH on a hunch it would help LFS (wow, what a
> difference for pkgsrc builds).
> I have not seen any crashes yet, but I don't think it's been long
> enough to tell.
> Support WFMU-FM: free-form radio for the masses!
> "The frivolity and boredom which unsettle the established order, the
> vague foreboding of something unknown, these are the heralds of
> approaching change. The gradual crumbling that left unaltered the the
> face of the whole is cut short by a sunburst which, in one flash,
> illuminates the features of the new world." --G.W.F. Hegel,
> _Phenomenology of Spirit_ 5:11