Subject: Re: phasing out mfs; make init(8) use tmpfs?
To: None <>
From: Eric Haszlakiewicz <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/16/2007 11:11:12
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:04:41PM -0600, David Young wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:55:51PM +0000, Geoff Wing wrote:
> > Only TMPFS?  What if TMPFS fails?
> I agree with you and Izumi Tsutsui, MFS ought to be attempted if TMPFS
> fails.

Three questions:
How does this work toward the stated goal of phasing out mfs?
Why would tmpfs fail?
If tmpfs fails, why wouldn't mfs fail?