Subject: Re: phasing out mfs; make init(8) use tmpfs?
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Eric Haszlakiewicz <email@example.com>
Date: 02/16/2007 11:11:12
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:04:41PM -0600, David Young wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:55:51PM +0000, Geoff Wing wrote:
> > Only TMPFS? What if TMPFS fails?
> I agree with you and Izumi Tsutsui, MFS ought to be attempted if TMPFS
How does this work toward the stated goal of phasing out mfs?
Why would tmpfs fail?
If tmpfs fails, why wouldn't mfs fail?