Subject: Re: phasing out mfs; make init(8) use tmpfs?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Juan RP <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/16/2007 02:12:19
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:38:23 +0000 (UTC)
Geoff Wing <email@example.com> wrote:
> David Young <firstname.lastname@example.org> typed:
> : On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:55:51PM +0000, Geoff Wing wrote:
> :> It doesn't have whitespace objects (so you can't do upper layer
> union mounts :> with it).
> : Do you use union mounts in this way on /dev/, today, or is this
> purely : hypothetical?
> I personally don't. Does fdesc work OK?
> : I ask because I have never been able to rely on union
> : mounts for anything, although it is my understanding that reliably
> may : have improved with recent changes by Chuck Silvers.
> This is not really related to your proposed change however I use union
> mounts mfs over ffs every time I build a kernel or build pkgsrc stuff.
> (Using mfs I can always start with a clean slate.) And union lfs on
> ffs for building the main src tree. It works beautifully for my
I can report that using null mounts is not a problem with tmpfs,
I've been using it for months with mklivecd... dunno about union
Juan RP's blog - NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish