Subject: Re: KAUTH_REQ_NETWORK_SOCKET_OPEN
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/01/2007 19:39:15
--s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:22:52PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>=20
> On Jan 31, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>=20
> >I think this is the real problem: we have insufficient granularity of
> >privilege on socket operations. It would be very nice to find a clean
> >way of handling arbitary Unix-type permissions. (I'd suggest netfs,
> >but someone would take me too seriously.)
>=20
> I would suggest Mach messages, but someone would probably flat-out =20
> *slap* me :-)
You wish.
--
Dan.
--s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFFwacyEAVxvV4N66cRAmHIAKDE8bqp4RMdmb5EeFLUHR4LQGtXwgCgsZv/
oBgFwJc5OoPs3SpKFhJe6Q0=
=uiMt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi--