On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 12:58:13PM +0100, Daniel Sieger wrote:
> 
> > - Is there a reason for the run queues to be tied in with the scheduler
> >   implementation?
> 
> Yes, there is. Different scheduler implementations may want to use
> a rather different runqueue structure.

That is unlikely to be useful unless:
- you assign a cpu to the scheduler
- one scheduler is higher priority than any other.

I suspect you need to separate process scheduling from process dispatching.

> As an example, think of Mindaugas' Linux-like scheduler.
Is that the one that refuses to allow high priority processes to pre-empt
low priority ones for large fractions of a second ? :-)

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk