Hello. In looking further at the wm(4) driver, I find I wonder about
the correctness of the enumerated list of chip types.  Specifically, I'm
assuming this is an ordered list, where the first item is number 0, and the
index increments for each chip type in the enumerated list.  I'll quote the
enumerated list below, but my question is, is this order correct?
Specifically, does the 82541 series of chips really come after the 82546
series?  If I'm reading this code corectly, then places where the chip type
is tested for some capability, like for all chips greater than the 82543, for
example, then the 82541 chip would test to be more capable than the 82543,
which seems counter intuitive to me.
	Could someone comment on this who  knows more than I about this
driver?
-thanks
-Brian


/*	$NetBSD: if_wm.c,v 1.100.2.5 2006/07/07 06:24:40 tron Exp $	*/
typedef enum {
	WM_T_unknown		= 0,
	WM_T_82542_2_0,			/* i82542 2.0 (really old) */
	WM_T_82542_2_1,			/* i82542 2.1+ (old) */
	WM_T_82543,			/* i82543 */
	WM_T_82544,			/* i82544 */
	WM_T_82540,			/* i82540 */
	WM_T_82545,			/* i82545 */
	WM_T_82545_3,			/* i82545 3.0+ */
	WM_T_82546,			/* i82546 */
	WM_T_82546_3,			/* i82546 3.0+ */
	WM_T_82541,			/* i82541 */
	WM_T_82541_2,			/* i82541 2.0+ */
	WM_T_82547,			/* i82547 */
	WM_T_82547_2,			/* i82547 2.0+ */
} wm_chip_type;