Subject: Re: new kpi proposal, sysdisk(9)
To: None <tech-security@NetBSD.org, tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 12/30/2006 14:45:22
> Kinda. Jason and I have a difference of opinion on this. :-)
> I personally think we should permit overlapping wedges and enforce
> the no-overlap on open. Jason, obviously, believes we should only
> have non-overlapping ones and thus no overlap problem.
Well, if you permit only non-overlapping wedges, what happens to the
functionality previously available from overlapping partitions? Do we
lose it? If so, that seems like a significant regression, to me. If
not, where does it go?
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML firstname.lastname@example.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B