Subject: Re: eliminating veriexec #ifdefs in vfs_vnops.c
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
Date: 12/30/2006 00:13:38
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>> - it seems quite racy. i don't know if it's a problem for veriexec, tho.
>>> first and second namei() can see different
>>> pathnames (if userland pathname buffer is modified) and/or
>>> vnode (if any components in the pathname is renamed).
>> that's what I was worried about: we do two consequtive namei() calls.
>> do you think there's a way we could have a single namei() in vn_open()
>> to avoid it? or maybe we can copy the pathname to the kernel in
>> vn_open(), and then in consequent namei() calls just use that. because
>> veriexec doesn't care about permissions but relies on internal tables
>> it shouldn't matter, I *think*.
> for the pathname problem, i suggested a solution in PR/35278.
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
can you be more specific?