Subject: Re: new kpi proposal, sysdisk(9)
To: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/29/2006 11:40:29
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 07:03:38PM +0200, Elad Efrat wrote:
> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > do you mean that raidframe doesn't have to involve VOP_OPEN or d_open?
> maybe. I didn't really look into it yet.
> >> or the interface can simply be changed to take a
> >> different parameter.
> > which interface are you talking about?
> sysdisk(9). it doesn't have to take vp.
> > i prefer another argument, but i don't think it is very important.
> if it can be passed in mode bits, and we find a way to resolve the issue
> for raidframe, we might be able to use it, but that'd probably mean
> adding another vnode flag etc.
Add another flag, if needed.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----