Subject: Re: new kpi proposal, sysdisk(9)
To: None <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
Date: 12/29/2006 22:15:56
> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> >>> do you mean that raidframe doesn't have to involve VOP_OPEN or d_open?
> >> maybe. I didn't really look into it yet.
> > although i didn't take a look either,
> > i don't think it can use underlying devices without VOP_OPEN
> > or d_open.
> > YAMAMOTO Takashi
> okay, anyway, if we do that, we'll be adding a flag that can be passed
> on the mode bits, that'll end up setting something in vp->v_flags. I'll
> look into raidframe stuff.
what is needed to be added in vp->v_flag?