> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> >>> do you mean that raidframe doesn't have to involve VOP_OPEN or d_open?
> >> maybe. I didn't really look into it yet.
> > 
> > although i didn't take a look either,
> > i don't think it can use underlying devices without VOP_OPEN
> > or d_open.
> > 
> > YAMAMOTO Takashi
> 
> okay, anyway, if we do that, we'll be adding a flag that can be passed
> on the mode bits, that'll end up setting something in vp->v_flags. I'll
> look into raidframe stuff.
> 
> -e.

what is needed to be added in vp->v_flag?

YAMAMOTO Takashi