YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>> do you mean that raidframe doesn't have to involve VOP_OPEN or d_open?
>> maybe. I didn't really look into it yet.
> 
> although i didn't take a look either,
> i don't think it can use underlying devices without VOP_OPEN
> or d_open.
> 
> YAMAMOTO Takashi

okay, anyway, if we do that, we'll be adding a flag that can be passed
on the mode bits, that'll end up setting something in vp->v_flags. I'll
look into raidframe stuff.

-e.