Subject: Re: new kpi proposal, sysdisk(9)
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
Date: 12/29/2006 15:05:46
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>> do you mean that raidframe doesn't have to involve VOP_OPEN or d_open?
>> maybe. I didn't really look into it yet.
> although i didn't take a look either,
> i don't think it can use underlying devices without VOP_OPEN
> or d_open.
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
okay, anyway, if we do that, we'll be adding a flag that can be passed
on the mode bits, that'll end up setting something in vp->v_flags. I'll
look into raidframe stuff.