Subject: Re: new kpi proposal, sysdisk(9) To: None <elad@NetBSD.org> From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org> List: tech-kern Date: 12/29/2006 22:01:04
> > do you mean that raidframe doesn't have to involve VOP_OPEN or d_open?
> maybe. I didn't really look into it yet.
although i didn't take a look either,
i don't think it can use underlying devices without VOP_OPEN