Subject: Re: new kpi proposal, sysdisk(9)
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
Date: 12/28/2006 17:58:08
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>> what you are proposing seems like another kind of open/close to me.
>>> VOP_OPEN and VOP_CLOSE are appropriate ways to handle them.
>>> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>> can you explain what VOP_OPEN() should we add flags to in case of swap
>> device or raidframe? I'm not sure I follow your logic just yet...
> in the case of swap, the one in swap_on(). i'm not sure about raidframe.
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
raidframe can be a problem with your approach I'm afraid.
either way, I'm not going to add a parameter to all VOP_OPEN() calls for