Subject: Re: page loaning and pagedaemon
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
Date: 12/06/2006 21:40:56
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:19:11AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > What will be the consequence of this change, other than pdpolicy being=
> > less confusing? i.e. there is some reason loaned pages were treated=20
> > special. Do we no longer need such treatment? Are we achieving the same=
> > goals differently?
> an obvious consequence of the change is that pagedaemon picks up
> ->K loaned pages. we have choices how to deal with these pages.
> 1. "pageout" the loaner side of the page by breaking the loan.
> (the page will be freed when it's unloaned.)
> 2. skip the page, maybe by activating it.
> my patch does #1.
> it shouldn't matter as far as durations of loaning are short.
> it could make differences for eg. a pipe which is rarely read.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----