Subject: Re: Bluetooth module on com(4)
To: None <>
From: KIYOHARA Takashi <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/05/2006 02:45:33
Hi! Iain,

From: Iain Hibbert <>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:45:20 +0000 (GMT)

> It should be possible to do similar but attach a pseudo device instance
> when the line discipline is opened, and the data does not need to pass
> through userland but can go directly through the line discipline to the
> bluetooth stack (the btuartd is just a place holder). If the line
> discipline is closed, the pseudo device is detached and all connections
> through it are killed automatically.

Sure.  I will write this in several days. ;-)

> PS I think naming would be better 'pseudo-device btXXX' & 'btXXXd' whether
> XXX is h4 or uart or something else (I think its Bluetooth H4 spec you
> need to refer to)

I think that btuart is better.  A pseudo-device named bth4 cannot be made
in above all.  ;-)