Subject: Re: NAMECACHE_ENTER_REVERSE (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern)
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/29/2006 06:04:03
On Nov 29, 5:43pm, email@example.com (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: NAMECACHE_ENTER_REVERSE (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern)
| > >then, what's a problem with just failing always and deal with it?
| > Some linux-emulated rdbm's don't work.
| i'm confused.
| while you can deal with the failure, rdbm's don't work? what does it mean?
If I deal with the failure, I think that they will work.
| > >something similar to what linux and dragonflybsd do.
| > I did not want to keep a full pathname buffer in struct proc. There
| > is also the issue of the binary being renamed/removed. I guess those
| > are corner cases that are not worth discussing though.
| is it related to what i said? i guess you replied to a wrong message.
I thought that Linux stores the pathname.