Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/secmodel/bsd44
To: None <>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/08/2006 08:16:20
> also note that some constructs actually set EPERM as the retval for the
> function and break. do you still think we should convert those that use
> the above construct to the one you suggest?

yes.  my point is not to assume failure of kauth_foo() is due to EPERM.